Mozilla needs to set the report straight: The corporate wants a license “to make a few of the primary performance” of its Firefox open supply browser potential, however that doesn’t give it possession of a consumer’s information.

The clarification comes days after the corporate launched Phrases of Use (TOU) for Firefox, together with an up to date Privateness Discover, explaining that whereas it has traditionally relied on its open supply license for Firefox, “we’re constructing a a lot completely different expertise panorama in the present day.”

Firefox TOU: A ‘nonexclusive, royalty-free worldwide license’

The Firefox TOU prompted some confusion as a result of initially it learn, as quoted in The Register:

Whenever you add or enter data by Firefox, you hereby grant us a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license to make use of that data that can assist you navigate, expertise, and work together with on-line content material as you point out along with your use of Firefox.

That phrasing set off a firestorm, and Mozilla subsequently eliminated that language. “Our intent was simply to be as clear as potential about how we make Firefox work, however in doing so we additionally created some confusion and concern,” wrote Ajit Varma, vice chairman of Firefox product administration, in a weblog publish on the corporate web site Friday.

The brand new language will now learn:

You give Mozilla the rights essential to function Firefox. This consists of processing your information as we describe within the Firefox Privateness Discover. It additionally features a nonexclusive, royalty-free, worldwide license for the aim of doing as you request with the content material you enter in Firefox. This doesn’t give Mozilla any possession in that content material.

Varma stated Mozilla additionally eliminated the reference to the Acceptable Use Coverage, explaining that it, too, “appears to be inflicting extra confusion than make clear.”

Privateness FAQ has additionally been up to date

The corporate has additionally up to date its Privateness FAQ “to raised deal with authorized minutia round phrases like ‘sells,’” wrote Varma. Mozilla determined to offer extra element about why it made the change within the first place, he stated.

“The rationale we’ve stepped away from making blanket claims that ‘We by no means promote your information’ is as a result of, in some locations, the LEGAL definition of ‘sale of knowledge’ is broad and evolving,’’ Varma defined.

He added that to make Firefox commercially viable, Mozilla does gather and share information with companions in “various locations,’’ together with the non-obligatory advertisements on New Tab and offering sponsored ideas within the search bar. That is set out within the Privateness Discover, Varma stated.

However the firm strives to make sure that the information it shares is “stripped of probably figuring out data, or shared solely within the combination,’’ he famous.